Legal Opinion

Dick v. Hitt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9429PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

It is urged by the appellee that the judgment should be affirmed without considering the errors alleged by the appellant, for the reason that the original complaint was held bad on demurrer, and it does not appear that any amended complaint was filed. It is true that it is not stated in terms that an amended complaint was filed, but we find that leave was taken to amend, and also find an amended complaint in the record. Under such circumstances the only reasonable presumption is that the appellant followed out the leave granted by filing the amended complaint found in the record. It would be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terrell v. State ex rel. GrubbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Williams v. NesbitIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Bozell v. HauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Campbell v. GouldIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Sayre v. McEwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moss v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Simpkins v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Hulman v. HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. First National Bank v. StapfIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Williams v. OsborneIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API