Legal Opinion

Forsha v. Nebraska Moline Plow Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1911No. 16,411PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Nuckolls county: Leslie G-. Hurd, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Action by Nathan Ray For sha, a minor, by his next friend, to recover damages for personal injury sustained by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendants. A trial in the district court for Nuckolls county resulted in ( a verdict against the Nebraska Moline Plow Company and in favor of Murdock & Son. From a judgment on the verdict the plow company has appealed.

It appears that the plow company is a Nebraska corporation having its principal place of business in the' city of Omaha, and is a manufacturer and jobber of agricultural implements; that Murdock & Son were engaged in the hardware…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gerner v. YatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Sholes v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. Andrew Murphy & SonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Kessler v. Bates & Rogers Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Tuttle v. Farmer's Handy Wagon Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Forsha v. Nebraska Moline Plow Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Garrison v. EverettNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API