Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. Andrew Murphy & Son

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1941No. 31088PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldred, District Judge.

This action was brought by John Mansfield to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of alleged negligence on the part of the defendant Andrew Murphy & Son, Inc. Plaintiff at time injured was an employee of Ford Bros. Van & Storage Company; but no negligence is charged as against that defendant, it being made a party defendant for the reason that it is obligated to make payments to plaintiff under the workmen’s compensation act of Nebraska.

*794The defendant Andrew Murphy & Son, Inc., conducts an automobile and truck sales service and garage business in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Driscoll v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Westover v. HooverNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Curry v. BrunsNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hitte v. Republican Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. B & G CRANE SERVICE v. Thomas W. Hooley & SonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  3. Stephens v. Celeryvale Transport, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Pettit v. State, Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Haw v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., and to Use of GiacomoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API