Provencher v. Provencher
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Scott G. Proveneher appeals from an order entered in the District Court (Lewiston, Cote, J.) denying his motion for relief from a divorce judgment pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 60(b). Scott contends that the denial of the motion for relief constitutes an abuse of the court’s discretion, and that the court improperly applied the best interest of the child standard in denying his motion. We affirm the District Court’s judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] Scott G. Proveneher and Jennifer A. Proveneher were divorced in July of 2005. Neither party was represented by counsel during the divorce proceedings.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- C.E.W. v. D.E.W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Reville v. RevilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Peterson v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Land Use Regulation Commission v. TuckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Estate of Mary E. HillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Melanie K. Marks v. Christopher L. MarksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021