Legal Opinion

Freeport Investment Co. v. R.A. Gray & Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1989No. A8702-01339; CA A47166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

In this contract action, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the action was barred by res judicata. The earlier action between plaintiff (Freeport) and defendant (Gray) was a third-party claim in Klimp v. Freeport Investment Co. Freeport had joined Gray as a third-party defendant, asserting breach of contract claims that would result in Gray’s indemnification of Freeport for any recovery Klimp might obtain against Freeport.1 Klimp’s three claims against Freeport for recission, breach of contract and misrepresentation arose as a consequence of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McAllister v. Charter First Mortgage, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Savelich Logging Company v. Preston Mill CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Long v. StormsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Long v. StormsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Arter v. SpathasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Marton v. Ater Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Feffer v. Administrative School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API