Legal Opinion
Robert Randall Krause v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided May 22, 2012No. 14-11-00884-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice.
Appellant Robert Randall Krause pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated after the trial court denied his motion to suppress blood test results. Appellant argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress because the person who obtained his blood specimen was licensed as an “emergency medical technician-intermediate” and, therefore, was not a “qualified technician” pursuant to Chapter 724 of the Texas Transportation Code.
Under Chapter 724, “emergency medical services personnel” are expressly excluded from being “qualified technician[s]”…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Lykos v. FineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Krause v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Krause v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Krause, Robert RandallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Krause, Robert RandallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Krause, Robert RandallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.