Krause v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
PRICE, J.,
filed a dissenting opinion in which WOMACK, J., joined.
Rachel Lopez was not a physician, chemist, registered professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse. If she was authorized to draw the appellant’s blood under the statute, it could only be by virtue of her status as a “qualified technician.”1 The statute does not define this term, but it does expressly provide that it “does not include emergency medical services personnel.” 2 Lopez received her training in blood extraction in her capacity as an Emergency Medical Technician-Intermediate (EMT-I).3 Insofar as the record reveals,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tapps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- State v. Laird, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- State v. Bingham, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
- Cavazos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Torres v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.