Legal Opinion
Holt v. Foot Locker Retail Inc
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 29, 2022No. 5:21-cv-04039Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS DANIEL HOLT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-4039-JWB FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendant Foot Locker Retail, Inc. moved for summary judgment. (Doc. 53.) The motion is fully briefed and ripe for decision. (Docs. 57, 58, 61.) For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 53) is GRANTED. Defendant’s second motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 39) is DENIED as moot. I. Facts and Procedural History The following statement of facts is taken from the parties’ submissions.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Lifewise Master Funding v. TelebankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Ann Garrison Pamela Bielski Vicky Dunbar Teresita Wells Connie Brady Sherry Conway Patricia Erickson v. Gambro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.