State v. Brooks
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant appeals his conviction of, and sentence on, seven counts of embezzlement. He raises six issues on appeal: (1) whether the single larceny doctrine applies in this case; (2) whether the court erred when it allowed a defense witness to be cross-examined about a subsequent uncharged allegation of embezzlement; (3) whether Defendant’s confessions should have been excluded; (4) whether the court erred in denying the motion for directed verdict because the State had not proved entrustment; (5) whether the court erred by denying the Defendant’s jury…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LankfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. HargroveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. MaestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AlfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BrooksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BrooksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. JacksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Health Plus of New Mexico, Inc. v. HarrellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.