Legal Opinion
Littell v. Hickle
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 8, 1970No. Civ. No. 19917PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Norman M. Littell (Littell), an attorney admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia, in the State of Washington, in the District of Columbia, and in the Courts, Commissions and Agencies in which claims in behalf of Indian Tribes are tried and determined, sued the then Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) in his official capacity as trustee for the Navajo Tribe of Indians of New Mexico, Arizona, Utah and Colorado. Jurisdiction is asserted under United States Code, Title 28, sections 1331 and 1391(e).
Plaintiff claims recovery under certain contracts of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States Ex Rel. McLennan v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. ForrestalSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Healing v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1962
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Littell v. MortonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Ware v. RichardsonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1972