Legal Opinion
Ware v. Richardson
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 24, 1972No. 71-809 CivPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action complaining, principally, that houses provided by the Kiowa Housing Authority are substandard and not worth the money being paid for them (presumably public money). Various of the Defendants have moved for dismissal on the ground that federal jurisdiction does not exist. This Opinion and Order is therefore confined to the sole issue of federal jurisdiction.
The parties and their respective positions in the suit are set out in the margin. 1 The Federal Defendants rely on sovereign immunity. Defendant Great Plains…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Twin Cities Chippewa Tribal Council v. Minnesota Chippewa TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Lee Motah and Horace Noyabad v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Prairie Band of Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians v. PuckkeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Native American Church of North America v. Navajo Tribal CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Housing Authority of the Kaw Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. City of Ponca City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Thomas Mack CrosslandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Housing Authority of the Choctaw Nation v. CraytorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Eastern Shoshone Tribe v. Northern Arapaho TribeDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1996
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Ed Driving HawkDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1976