United States v. Manon
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Dario Manon challenges his conviction on three drug distribution charges based on ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues, inter alia, that his trial attorney failed to (1) call important witnesses on his behalf, (2) timely arrange for a non-suggestive identification procedure, and (3) object to the admission of prejudicial hearsay evidence. Although we ordinarily do not consider ineffective assistance claims on direct appeal, Ma-non’s claim is fully developed because the district court held a post-trial evidentiary hearing to explore his allegations. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nazzaro Scarpa v. Larry E. Dubois, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Florita Bell Griffin, Terrence Bernard Roberts, Joe Lee WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Sylvan AbneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Fortune v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Baerga-Suárez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- De Jesús-Velázquez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Daniel L. Fortune v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.