Brewington v. North Carolina Department of Correction
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCRODDEN, Judge.
Plaintiff brings forward two arguments based on numerous assignments of error. First, he contends that the Commission erred in adopting the decision and order of the Deputy Commissioner because the Deputy Commissioner’s findings of fact were not supported by the evidence which, he contends, actually showed that defendant was negligent.
Appeals to this Court from the full Industrial Commission are “for errors of law only ... and the findings of fact of the Commission shall be conclusive if there is any competent evidence to support them.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-293 (1990). It…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Joyner v. Rocky Mount MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Hardin v. Venture Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richardson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Fennell v. North Carolina Department of Crime Control & Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Hummel v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Richardson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Cedarbrook Residential Ctr., Inc. v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.