Legal Opinion

Richardson v. North Carolina Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 16, 1995No. COA94-737PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*705LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiff was permanently injured while working on a silage harvesting machine at Caldonia Farm in Tillery, North Carolina, operated by the North Carolina Department of Correction. On 23 September 1991, plaintiff filed a claim with the North Carolina Industrial Commission under the Tort Claims Act, N.C.G.S. §§ 143-291 to -300.1. In its amended answer, defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs claim on the grounds that workers’ compensation was plaintiff’s exclusive remedy. By order filed 6 January 1993, Deputy Commissioner Jan N. Pittman granted defendant’s motion to dismiss.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ivey v. North Carolina Prison DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Lawson v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Brewington v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Wagoner v. ButcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Gould v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Harris v. Thompson Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Kerr v. Department of CorrectionNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008
  4. Richardson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Stevenson v. N.C.D.O.C.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API