Legal Opinion

City of Lincoln v. Harts

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Logan county; the Hon. Charles J. Gepilbach, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

This is the fourth presentation of the subject matter of this controversy to, this court. In 1910 the city council of the city of Lincoln passed an ordinance for the paving of Kickapoo street. The paving was constructed but the ordinance was held void. (City of Lincoln v. Harts, 250 Ill. 273.) The city then passed a supplemental ordinance for a special assessment to pay for the improvement, and this ordinance was also held void because it was not authorized by sections 57 and 58 of the Local Improvement act. (City of Lincoln v. Harts, 256 Ill. 253.) The legislature afterward amended those…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lusk v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People ex rel. Horberg v. WaiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. City of Lincoln v. HartsIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. City of Lincoln v. HartsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. City of Peru v. BartelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. BurksIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. H F G Co. v. Pioneer Pub. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1947
  3. Village of Winnetka v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Woods v. Village of LaGrange ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API