Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

We granted the State’s Rule 11, T.R.A.P., application for permission to appeal in order to determine: (I) whether the Court of Criminal Appeals correctly held that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that criminal trespass is a lesser included offense within the indicted offense, second degree burglary; and (II) whether the Court of Criminal Appeals correctly held that, where the trial court erroneously instructed the jury that they were authorized to return determinate sentences for the offenses of an attempt to commit a felony, and the jury did so,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Holt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  4. Leek v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  5. McBee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  2. State v. BoyceCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. State v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. United States v. Jay Thomas KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Thomas Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API