Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Chief Justice.

The issue before this court is whether the double jeopardy clauses of the state and federal constitutions bar a prosecution for vehicular homicide when the defendant, prior to the victim’s death, had pled guilty to and been sentenced in municipal court for driving while under the influence of an intoxicant, disregarding a stop sign, and unlawful possession of a controlled substance. We find no double jeopardy violation and reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals dismissing the indictment for vehicular homicide.

A truck driven by defendant collided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Jeffers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1982
  5. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DentonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Santiago PérezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2003
  3. Daniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rickey E. Mitchell v. W.J. Michael Cody, Attorney General of the State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Harding v. BockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API