Legal Opinion
State v. R.M. H.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 16, 1999No. C0-99-559PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
R.M.H. appeals his conviction on stipulated facts for speeding and driving without a license on an Indian reservation, contending that the state lacked subject matter jurisdiction to prosecute him. We reverse.
FACTS
R.M.H., a fifteen-year-old, was cited for speeding and driving without a license on the White Earth Reservation. The parties stipulated to the following relevant facts: R.M.H. was driving without a license within the boundaries of the White Earth Reservation, going 64 miles per hour in a 50-mile-per-hour zone. R.M.H is not enrolled in the Minnesota Chippewa…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. St. ClairCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Topash v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. R.M.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. RMhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. RMHCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000