Legal Opinion
State v. RMh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 24, 2000No. C0-99-559PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
617 N.W.2d 55 (2000)
STATE of Minnesota, petitioner, Appellant,
v.
R.M.H., Respondent.
No. C0-99-559.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 24, 2000.
Rehearing Denied October 3, 2000.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
The issue before us is whether the State of Minnesota has jurisdiction to enforce its speeding and driver's license laws against an Indian who commits these offenses on a state highway located on the reservation of a tribe of which the Indian is not an enrolled member. The district court concluded that Minnesota does have jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BusseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000