Legal Opinion

Stoney-Brook Development Corp. v. Town of Fremont

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 2, 1984No. 82-536PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

On November 2, 1982, a Master (R. Peter Shapiro, Esq.) found that the “Comprehensive Community Plan” of the defendant, Town of Fremont, is not a legally sufficient master plan *586or capital improvement program to support the adoption of a growth control ordinance enacted under RS'A 31:62-a (Supp. 1983) (repealed by Laws 1983, 447:5, I) (current version at RSA 674:22 (Supp. 1983)). The master further recommended that the town’s growth control ordinance (Article IV-A of the Fremont Zoning Ordinance) should be deemed illegal and unenforceable. The Superior Court (Wyman, J.) approved the master’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Patenaude v. Town of MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Beck v. Town of RaymondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Rochester v. BarcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Chesterfield v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Rancourt v. Town of BarnsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Caspersen v. Town of LymeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Jensen's, Inc. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. Powers v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API