Stoney-Brook Development Corp. v. Town of Fremont
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
On November 2, 1982, a Master (R. Peter Shapiro, Esq.) found that the “Comprehensive Community Plan” of the defendant, Town of Fremont, is not a legally sufficient master plan *586or capital improvement program to support the adoption of a growth control ordinance enacted under RS'A 31:62-a (Supp. 1983) (repealed by Laws 1983, 447:5, I) (current version at RSA 674:22 (Supp. 1983)). The master further recommended that the town’s growth control ordinance (Article IV-A of the Fremont Zoning Ordinance) should be deemed illegal and unenforceable. The Superior Court (Wyman, J.) approved the master’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Patenaude v. Town of MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Beck v. Town of RaymondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Rochester v. BarcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Chesterfield v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Rancourt v. Town of BarnsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Caspersen v. Town of LymeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Jensen's, Inc. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Powers v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.