Legal Opinion

Bonaparte v. Neff

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1992No. 19611PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This is an appeal from two separate judgments after remand awarding attorney fees to defendants, Steve and Rickie Neff (Neffs), and to third-party defendants, Dennis and Carol Ulery (Ulerys). This ease was appealed to us previously on the same issues of whether the district court properly ordered the plaintiff, Isaac Bonaparte, to pay the Neffs’ and the Ulerys’ costs and attorney fees. Bonaparte v. Neff, 116 Idaho 60, 773 P.2d 1147 (Ct.App.1989) (Bonaparte I). After a remand order, the district court again ordered that Bonaparte pay the costs and attorney fees incurred by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Capps v. WoodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Bonaparte v. NeffIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Strand v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sutheimer v. StoltenbergIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. HillmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API