Legal Opinion

White v. Beloginis

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 13, 1971No. 69 Civ. 2858PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff here moves pursuant to Rule 37(a) (2)-(4) of Fed.R.Civ.P. for an order compelling defendant to answer interrogatories one through twelve; to provide plaintiff with copies of documents requested in interrogatories three through twelve; and to pay plaintiff $100.00 for expenses incurred in' bringing this motion as a result of defendant’s prior refusal to answer adequately these interrogatories.

Defendant responded to three of the twelve interrogatories posed to him, numbers one, two, and eight. The Court finds these answers incomplete and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woods v. KornfeldDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Wolf v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Lizza & Sons, Inc. v. Diminico & Pallotta, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
  4. Willys Motors, Inc. v. Northwest Kaiser-Willys, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1956

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Harding v. Dana Transport, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  4. United States v. 58.16 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1975
  5. In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API