Legal Opinion

Varner v. Varner

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1998No. E020602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, Acting P. J.

A former wife appeals from an order which modified her spousal support award by reducing the level of support, limiting it to one additional year, and terminating jurisdiction to make further modifications in it thereafter. Concluding that the trial court erred both in limiting support to one year and in terminating jurisdiction, we modify the order by striking those provisions and affirm it as modified.

Factual and Procedural Background

After living together for about two years, Kim Denise Varner and Stephen Varner were married in December of 1977. At that time,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Adoption of Alexander S.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. In Re Marriage of HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Gold v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Reed v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. City of Lodi v. RandtronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Low v. LanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API