Legal Opinion

We Advocate Through Environmental Review v. City of Mt. Shasta

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 2022No. C091012Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 4/12/22; Certified for Publication 5/11/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Siskiyou) ---- WE ADVOCATE THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL C091012 REVIEW et al., (Super. Ct. No. Plaintiffs and Appellants, SCCVPT20180531) v. CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA et al., Defendants and Respondents; CRYSTAL GEYSER WATER COMPANY, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. From 2001 to 2010, a water bottling company operated a plant in Siskiyou County (the County) that extracted groundwater and then used it to produce bottled water. A few years after the plant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. City of Marina v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API