Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Hayes
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 23, 1993No. 93-1597PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.
Because Daniel D. Hayes (“Hayes”) provided substantial assistance to the government, the district court reduced his sentence of imprisonment from the statutory mandatory minimum of 60 months to 47 months. Dissatisfied with the amount of the reduction and the method by which it was calculated, Hayes appeals. We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). 1 Because the district court used an appropriate method for calculating the departure from Hayes’ mandatory minimum sentence, we affirm.
I
The instant appeal is Hayes’ third sentencing appeal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Mattie Lou ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Gregory Scott Bigelow, Vincent Lima, and Anthony W. Vaughan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Marcos M. CojabCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Daniel D. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Terry W. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Bernard J. Morgano, Dominick Palermo, Nicholas Guzzino, Peter Petros, Sam Nuzzo, Jr. And Samuel GloriosoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Salvador PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Vince A. AuldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Glenn Ford, Robert Gipson and Ladell JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.