Legal Opinion

Quady v. Sickl

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1952Published

1Opinion of the Court

260 Wis. 348 (1951)

QUADY, Plaintiff and Respondent,

vs.

SICKL, Defendant:

BELDEN and another, Defendants and Respondents:

PANKRATZ and others, Defendants and Appellants.[*]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 4, 1951.

January 8, 1952.

For the appellants there were briefs by Genrich & Terwilliger, attorneys, and Emil A. Wakeen, Walter H. Piehler, and Neil M. Conway of counsel, all of Wausau, and oral argument by Herbert Terwilliger.

For the respondent David E. Quady there was a brief by Spohn, Ross, Stevens & Lamb, attorneys, and Frank A. Ross and James F. Spohn of counsel, all of Madison, and oral…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McGuiggan v. HillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Zenner v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Pietsch v. McCarthyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API