Legal Opinion

Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1961No. 38059PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Buena Vista McDaniel brought this action against Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company to recover damages for drainage in the sum of $1,745.18, and for further future damages of $1,250 for breach of an implied covenant in an oil lease to protect plaintiff’s mineral interest from drainage. The case was tried to a jury resulting in a verdict in favor of Buena Vista McDaniel for the full amount. After judgment on the verdict was rendered and motion for new trial overruled, Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company appealed. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. York v. TriggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Haynes Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Wilcox v. RyndakSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Plains Petroleum Corp. v. FineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. North American Petroleum Company v. KnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sarah M. Spaeth v. Union Oil Company of California, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Spiller v. Massey & MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Quintin Little v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API