Legal Opinion

Magna Oil & Refining Co. v. Uncle Sam Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 8, 1921No. 11563PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Owen Owen, Judge. Action by the Magna Oil & Refining Company against the Uncle Sam Oil Company-for damages for breach of contract. From order discharging attachment, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This is an action for damages for breach of contract, commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against defendant in error, defendant below. At the time of filing the petition, - the -plaintiff filed an affidavit in attachment setting up, among other things, that the defendant, Uncle Sam Oil Company, a corporation, was organized and chartered under - the laws of the state of Arizona,, and therefore is-- a- foreign corpora tion, against whose property the plaintiff is entitled to have an attachment under that part of section 4812, Rev. Laws 1910, which provides as follows:

“The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Savage v. People's Building, Loan & Savings Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. In re Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  3. Bowen v. First National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Jennings v. Idaho Railway, Light & Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fenton v. Sinclair Refining CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Fenton v. Sinclair Refining CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Opinion No. 79-286 (1979) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Hillcrest Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Hillcrest Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API