Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fenton v. Sinclair Refining Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1955No. 36289Published

1DissentHalley, Justice

It is my contention that a party plaintiff cannot be a nonresident for one purpose and a resident for another in the same action. We know that if an attempt to remove this case to the Federal Court had been made in the trial court, the administrator would immediatley have set up that he was a resident of Maine as was the defendant and assert there was no diversity of citizenship. However, here the counsel for the administrator are claiming that for the purposes of this lawsuit he is a resident of Oklahoma because he is the personal representative of the deceased who was a resident of Oklahoma…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. North Pac. S. S. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. National Valve & Mfg. Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Magna Oil & Refining Co. v. Uncle Sam Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API