Legal Opinion
Fenton v. Sinclair Refining Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 23, 1955No. 36289Published
1Opinion of the Court
283 P.2d 799 (1955)
William FENTON, Administrator of the Estate of Noble T. Rush, Deceased, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, Defendant in Error.
No. 36289.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
February 23, 1955.
Rehearing Denied May 17, 1955.
I.D. Moseley, Robert W. Raynolds of Moseley & Raynolds, John M. Wheeler, John M. Wheeler, Jr., of Wheeler & Wheeler, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.
Ralph W. Garrett, Robert L. Imler, Dudley C. Phillips, Truman B. Rucker, Tulsa, for defendant in error.
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
This action was commenced by William Fenton as administrator of the estate of Noble T.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Louisville v. Hart's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Goode, Adm'x.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.