Legal Opinion

Nelson v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 2001No. 1069, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

In evidentiary terms, how does one classify a victim’s reporting or recounting of a sexual attack when that report is offered at trial through the testimony of the person who heard it? Perplexingly, it may be many things, each -with its own qualifying rules and each with its own evidentiary significance.

It may sometimes be a prior consistent statement, admissible only in rebuttal and only after the victim has testified, offered to rehabilitate the victim’s impeached testimonial credibility. In that capacity, it is non-hearsay. Cole v. State, 83 Md.App. 279, 296-302, 574 A.2d…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. The People v. DamenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  3. Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Saldiveri v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Murphy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gregg Neck Yacht Club, Inc. v. County CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Perry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Lawson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Hyman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API