Legal Opinion

Gala v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1998No. 0010 E.D. Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NEWMAN, Justice.

We granted allocatur in this matter to address the issue of whether a defendant must present medical literature to justify a “two schools of thought” instruction.

In March of 1988, Hiren S. Gala (Appellant) underwent surgery for removal of a schwannoma, a benign tumor on a nerve in his neck. His wife, who is a pathologist, first noticed the lump on her husband’s neck in December 1987. Ralph Hamilton, M.D., a plastic surgeon, and Michael O’Connor, M.D. a neurosurgeon, (Appellees), performed the operation. Prior to the surgery, Appellees did not know which nerve was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brannan v. Lankenau HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Sinclair by Sinclair v. BlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Duckworth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Jones v. ChidesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Remley v. PlummerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trach v. FellinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Wetzel v. Shaffer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2005
  4. Burke v. Northrup, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1999
  5. Colangeli v. Pallone, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API