Legal Opinion

Buchholz v. Gorsuch

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 27, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The legal sufficiency of the evidence to support the appellee’s recovery of commissions, on account of the sale of certain real estate of the appellants, in Baltimore County, is the principal subject of inquiry presented by this appeal. There was testimony from which, though contradicted in important particulars, the jury could find: that the appellants authorized the appellee, who is a real estate broker, to list their property for sale on a five per cent, commission basis; that he advertised it in the Baltimore Sun, and after various efforts to sell it, he brought the property to. the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keener v. HarrodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  2. Blake v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  3. Jones v. AdlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  4. Walker v. Baldwin & FrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  5. Baltimore Car Wheel Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ricker v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Heslop v. DieudonneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Steele v. SethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Sanders v. DevereuxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. Wyand v. Patterson Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API