Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Moline Plow Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
The appellee the Moline Plow Company brought this action against the appellant to recover damage for the alleged breach of conditions in a bill of lading. The complaint alleges that the defendant, a common carrier, undertook for hire to carry certain goods belonging to plaintiff from the town of Brownshurg, Indiana, to the city of Indianapolis. That a written contract or hill of lading was executed, in which one J. C. Smalley was named as the consignor and the Union Transfer and Storage Company of Indianapolis was named as the consignee; that both the consignor and consignee were merely the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bliven Mead v. . Hudson River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Western Transportation Co. v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Bates v. StantonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852
- Pennsylvania Co. v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geisendorff v. CobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Johnston v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- United States Express Co. v. HammerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PartlowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Michigan Central Railroad v. S. J. Peabody Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.