Legal Opinion

United States Express Co. v. Hammer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1898No. 2,711PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

This was an action in replevin, commenced before a justice of the peace, wherein appellee was plaintiff and appellant was defendant. The case was tried in the justice’s court, resulting in *187a judgment for appellee. Upon appeal to the court below, the facts were agreed to, adopted by the court as its special finding of facts, upon which conclusions of law were stated, and judgment rendered thereon in favor of appellee. The facts found are as follows: That appellant was a common carrier of goods for hire; that it had and maintained an office in the city of Indianapolis, and at the town of Eay,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Southern Express Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Ela v. American Merchants' Union Express Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Merchants Despatch & Transportation Co. v. MerriamIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Russell & Annis v. Livingston & WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City Nat. Bank of El Paso v. El Paso & N. E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Mayer v. Southern Pacific Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1916
  3. City Nat. Bank of El Paso v. El Paso & N. E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Pontiac Refining Co. v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API