Legal Opinion

Jernigan v. Clark and Day Exploration Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1959No. 6464PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The plaintiffs in error complain before this Court of a judgment rendered against them by the district court of Bernalillo County in favor of the defendant in error in purported compliance with the New Mexico Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1953 Comp. § 59-10-1 et seq. for compensation at the rate of $30 per week for the period of 550 weeks as and for total permanent disability. Since the position of the parties as movants is reversed in this Court from what it was below, the parties will henceforth be designated in this opinion as they were below.

The plaintiff filed two…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sais v. City Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Claim of Lyle v. H. R. Lyle Cider & Vinegar Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Cooper v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. In Re Field's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Baca v. PereaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. AtlasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Shillinglaw v. Owen Shillinglaw Fuel CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Gantt v. L & G AIR CONDITIONINGNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Martinez v. Zia Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API