Legal Opinion

Op. Atty. Gen. 59a-32 (Cr. Ref. 441h 477b-34)

Minnesota Attorney General Reports

Decided January 25, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

MUNICIPALITIES: ZONING: AMENDMENT: With certain exceptions, municipal zoning ordinances may be adopted or amended by majority vote of governing body notwithstanding charter provision, or ordinance requiring greater majority.

Minn. Stat. §§ 462.351, 462.357. 59a-32 (Cr. Ref. 441h; 477b-34) January 25, 2002 Mr. Brian D. Neugebauer Moorhead City Attorney Ohnstad Twichell, P.C. 901 13th Avenue East P.O. Box 458 West Fargo, ND 58078-0458 Dear Mr. Neugebauer: Thank you for your letter concerning the number of city council votes required to adopt or amend zoning ordinances. FACTS In 2001, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Town of Lowell v. City of CrookstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Borgelt v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Lilly v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API