Legal Opinion
Caudle v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 19, 2011No. Civil Action 08-00205 (HHK)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
In June and July of 2010, a three-week jury trial was held in this case. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs Frazier Caudle, Nikeith Goins, William James, Sholanda Miller, and Donald Smalls, concluding that the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) had retaliated against plaintiffs in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The District now moves for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, and remittitur of the jury’s award of damages to four of the five…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Caudle v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Pierson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- St. John v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Mamantov v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Chambers v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.