Mills v. State Board of Osteopathic Registration & Examination
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by Dav,id A. Mills to compel the State Board of Osteopathic Registration and Examination to issue a certificate entitling relator to practice osteopathy.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Respondent board was created under Act No. 163 of the Public Acts of 1903. This act was approved May 38, 1903, and took effect September 17, 1903. Section 3 of said act reads:
‘c Any person, before engaging in the practice of osteopathy in this State, shall, upon the payment of a fee of twenty-five dollars, make application for a certificate to practice osteopathy to the Board of Osteopathic Registration and Examination, on a form prescribed. * * * If the facts thus set forth * * * shall meet the require*526ments of the board, •* * * then the board shall require the applicant to submit to an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Ex parte LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Osborn v. Charlevoix Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Churchill v. BemisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Krausmann v. StreeterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- State v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Braseth v. State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Sawyer v. GallagherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.