Legal Opinion
State v. Sorenson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 1, 1988No. C9-88-225Published
1Opinion of the Court
430 N.W.2d 231 (1988)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Cal S. SORENSON, Appellant.
No. C9-88-225.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
October 11, 1988.
Review Granted December 1, 1988.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Stanich, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Dennis M. Sobolik, Kittson Co. Atty., Brink, Sobolik, Severson, Vroom & Malm, P.A., Hallock, for respondent.
Bruce Nielsen, Lancaster, for appellant.
Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and RANDALL and MULALLY[*], JJ., without oral argument.
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Cal S. Sorenson appeals from a conviction for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.