Legal Opinion

Burchfield v. State

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 6, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GODDARD, Judge.

This appeal results from a claim made by Norman Burchfield against the State of Tennessee for creating a nuisance which resulted in the flooding of Mr. Burchfield’s property. The claim was originally before the Claims Commission and transferred by the Commission to the Court of Claims pursuant to T.C.A. 9-8-402(c).

The Claims Commissioner found that in the construction of U.S. Highway 411, which is also State Highway 35, the State created a nuisance by installing a drain under the road at an insufficient depth which resulted in the flooding of Mr. Burchfield’s property.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  2. Pate v. City of MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stevens v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  4. Pleasant View Utility District v. VradenburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Morgan County v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A.B. Normal, LLC v. State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021
  2. Charles w. McKinney, a resident of Smith County, Tennessee v. Smith County, Tennessee, a county duly constituted by the State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. H.P. Large, and Terrance R. Craig, d/b/a Greenfield Land and Cattle Company v. Greene County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  4. Henson v. Carte rCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. Keener v. Knox Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API