Legal Opinion

Penick v. Eddleman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1926No. 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Appellee, Eddleman, owned lot 10 in block 55, in Cisco, Tex., upon which he proposed to erect a two-story building. Prior to the erection of the building he entered into a contract with the telephone company whereby he leased the second story of the building to that company. This lease contained this provision:

“For the consideration herein named, the landlord agrees not to léase or permit any lessee to lease or sublet any portion of the building in which the premises hereby leased are a part thereof, for the purpose of operating a moving picture show, garage or dance hall, or for any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Forrest v. DurnellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. German-American Sav. Bank v. GollmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Racke v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Davidson v. HirschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Goldman v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willis v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Penick v. EddlemanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API