Legal Opinion
Penick v. Eddleman
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided February 23, 1927No. 899—4649PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.
This is a suit brought by J. D. Eddleman, the defendant in error, against R. L. Penick and R. L. Haynie, the, *195plaintiffs in error, to recover the sum of $15,-000 rent. Judgment was rendered for Eddle-men. Penick and Haynie appealed, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 283 S. W. 300..
So far as necessary to state them here, the facts are as follows: On March 20, 1920, Ed-dleman leased to Penick and Haynie the lower story of a certain two-story building in the city of Cisco, which building was in process of erection. The lease contract is in writing, and by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Teague v. SowderTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- McRee's Adm'rs v. MeansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- United States v. HammersSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Johnson v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Fred v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Fabrique, Inc. v. Corman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Dillingham v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Houck v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Cedar Contracting, Inc. and Lands & Leases, Inc. v. Ronald Hernandez and Connie Hernandez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.