Legal Opinion

Pease v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1936No. 6949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, a civil engineer, was president and principal stockholder of the Pease Engineering Company of Cleveland, Ohio. In the taxing years of 1924 to 1930, inclusive, he supervised the construction, improvements, and repairs of streets, alleys, bridges, sidewalks, and sewer drains in eight villages and one city in Ohio, for which he was paid for his services to the villages fees equal to an agreed percentage of the cost of their improvements. The city, Cleveland Heights, paid a fixed salary. In each of the years he was paid a salary as president of the Pease…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Helvering v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Wright v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Wurlitzer v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodwin's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Consoer, Older & Quinlan, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  3. Pope v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Boomer v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1938
  5. Moore v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API