Legal Opinion

Wright v. Clark

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1928No. 21080PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This action was begun in the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county by Arthur H. Clark and John Freeman, as taxpayers, on behalf of the village of Bedford, Ohio, and .all taxpayers thereof, to recover a judgment in approximately the sum of $12,000 against Bayard T. Wright. It is alleged that Wright is the village engineer of the village of Bedford, and that the office of village engineer is a public office, and that Wright held said office for the years 1924 and 1925. During the period of his alleged incumbency it is claimed that he entered into numerous contracts with the village of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. Village of PlymouthOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Council of Village of Bedford v. State Ex Rel. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Village of Mayfield Heights v. IrishOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Pease v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  5. Pease v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API