Legal Opinion
Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corp. v. Gray Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 14, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 14247PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNALLY, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The plaintiff, a Texas corporation, seeks to recover for the alleged infringement of U. S. Letter Patent No. 3,000,576 for a “spray gun” for the airless spraying of paints and other liquid finishing materials, granted September 19, 1961, to Gustave S. Levey and Stanton F. Harvey, of which plaintiff is now the owner. The defendant is a Minnesota corporation with an established place of business within this District and Division. It has sold a number of its so-called “FF” (meaning fine finish) tips for use in its own spray guns and with guns of other…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Binks Manufacturing Company, Etc. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- National Latex Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company, Akron Presform Mold Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc. v. William T. Graham. William T. Graham v. Jeoffroy Mfg., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gray Company, Inc. v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corp. v. Gray Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1964
- The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corp. v. Binks Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Texas · 1967
- Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corp. v. Braniff Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation v. Braniff Airways, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970