Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Siegal v. Dros

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loretto, J.

Relator has sued out a writ of habeas corpus. On the argument, with the consent of the People, the relator was released on his own recognizance pending the deter- • ruination of his application. He was directed to return to court on the date the court would render its decision. Relator returned to court to deliver himself into custody on that date.

He was released on his own recognizance for two reasons: (1) to allow the court time to consider and determine this application unhurriedly, and (2) to reduce any claim for damages that the relator might later assert against the City of New York in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Wong Doo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. People Ex Rel. Battista v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SchildhausNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. People v. ColdironYonkers City Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API