Legal Opinion

Ware v. Supreme Beverage Co.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided February 25, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-00059-AKKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ABDUL K. KALLON, District Judge.

Raphael Ware pursues claims against Supreme Beverage Company, Inc. (“SBC”) for discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) and § 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.1 See doc. 1. Based on this court’s review of the evi*1247dence and the law, Ware failed to establish that racial animus factored into the elimination of his Red Bull route and his subsequent transfer to a beer merchandiser position, or that retaliatory animus factored into…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Borden v. Birmingham Heart Clinic PCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API