Legal Opinion

Borden v. Birmingham Heart Clinic PC

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided May 20, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01547Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION PAMELA BORDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action Number 2:18-cv-01547-AKK ) BIRMINGHAM HEART CLINIC, ) P.C., ) ) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pamela Borden asserts claims against her former employer, Birmingham Heart Clinic, P.C. (“BHC”), for alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”). Doc. 23.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API