Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 3, 1986No. 919, Docket 85-9041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Circuit Judge:

Appeal by Sears, Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”) and five of its financial service subsidiary companies, Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), Allstate Life Insurance Company (“Allstate Life”), Allstate Enterprises, Inc. (“AEI”), Coldwell, Banker & Company (“Coldwell Banker”), and Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. (“Dean Witter”), from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Jose A. Cabranes, Judge, 641 F.Supp. 878, upholding the constitutionality of a Connecticut banking statute, Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 36-5a(a)-(d) (West Supp.1986), (the “Act”),…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valley Bank of Nevada, a Nevada Banking Corporation v. Plus System, Inc., a Delaware Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Town of East HamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  3. Sears, Roebuck And Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API